Skip to main content
Want to correct or add a campaign to our database?

Les antibios, comme il faut, quand il faut

Objective(s)
Educate pet owners on proper antibiotic use (dose, duration)

Change behaviors regarding antibiotic overuse in companion animals
Target audience
Farmers and food producers
Veterinarians and those working in animal health
Pet owners
Campaign Scope
National
Partners or Allies
N/A
Communication Channels Used
Social Media
websites/blogs
Social Media Used
X (Twitter)
Facebook
LinkedIn
YouTube
Ministry of agriculture's accounts
Campaign Material(s)
Video
Press releases
Key messages
Antibiotics are not automatic for animals either
→ Emphasizes that, just like in human medicine, antibiotics should not be used routinely or without medical justification in animals.

Misuse of antibiotics in pets contributes to antimicrobial resistance
→ Highlights that overuse or incorrect use of antibiotics in animals can lead to resistance, which may affect both animal and human health.

Proper use = correct dose, duration, and prescription adherence
→ Encourages pet owners to strictly follow veterinary prescriptions regarding dosage and treatment length.

Trust your veterinarian’s guidance
→ Reinforces the veterinarian's role as the appropriate authority for prescribing antibiotics and advising on alternatives.

Protect antibiotic effectiveness by avoiding unnecessary use
→ Connects responsible use today with preserving antibiotic efficacy for the future.
Campaign Focus
Animal health
Campaign Setting
Community
Professional
Veterinary clinics
Pharmacies
Digital platform
Media and Public outreach
Use of Scientific Evidence
Implicit Evidence-Based Messaging
Visual and Symbolic Elements
Memorable slogan
Pictograms and simple visuals
Color palette
Design for clarity
Educational model applied
Transmissive
Content Complexity Level
Basic
Adaptation to Educational Levels
Adults
Complementary materials
Leaflets
Communication kit
Infographics
Banners
Posters
Content accessibility
Yes
Content accessibility
Plain language
Visual design
Diversity and Inclusion
Yes
Diversity and Inclusion
Inclusive language
Avoidance of stereotypes
Involvement of Vulnerable Groups
No
Cultural Sensitivity and Contextualization
Yes
Cultural Sensitivity and Contextualization
Relevant examples
Local actor collaboration
Campaign Start Month
9
Campaign Start Year
2014
Campaign End Year
2014
Replicability
Yes
Content usage license
Copyright
Campaign Status
Inactive with live site
Evaluation methods used
Baseline studies
Media reach tracking
Community participation in evaluation
No
Quantitative impact indicators
Reach
Measured results
Distribution metrics:

30,000 veterinary clinics received posters and brochures.

Press kits sent to 350 journalists and 1,000 radio stations.
Estimated budget
200 000 €
Identified gaps
Single-language with a focused national audience
No adaptation for different age groups
Accessible formats for hearing impaired users not provided
Accessible formats for visually impaired users not provided
Identified gaps
Language: Only in French; no multilingual versions available.

Accessibility: No alternative formats (e.g., large print, audio).

Excluded Groups: Children, elderly, low-literacy individuals, people with disabilities.

Digital Divide: No offline formats tailored to non-digital users beyond vet clinics
Lessons learned
Clear, concise key message summaries may help reduce misinterpretation.
A central campaign hub or website can improve discoverability and consistency.
Labelling a “Resources” section may help users find and use materials more easily.
Tailoring content to specific groups (e.g., parents, seniors, teens) may enhance impact.
Lessons learned
What worked:

Simple slogan and visual identity made the message easy to remember.

Veterinary channels were effective at reaching the target audience (pet owners).

What didn’t:

Missed opportunities for inclusive design and multilingual reach.

Limited engagement mechanisms; information was one-directional.

Recommendations:

Add inclusive formats and languages.

Introduce interactive or participatory components (e.g., quizzes, testimonials).

Broaden partnerships with community organizations to reach marginalized groups.
Identified biases
Cultural/Contextual Bias
Digital Access Bias
Educational Bias
Disability Accessibility Bias
Identified Weaknesses
No translation to other languages
Limited feedback loop
Limited accessibility
Identified Weaknesses
Lack of inclusion: Did not address non-French speakers, children, elderly, or people with disabilities.

Limited cultural adaptation: Messaging not tailored to regional or minority contexts.

No Public impact data: Absence of published evaluation or behavior-change metrics.
Identified Strengths
Call to Action
Clear messaging
Multichannel dissemination
Engagement with stakeholders
Identified Strengths
Design Simplicity: Effective use of pictograms and plain language.
Documents