Skip to main content
Want to correct or add a campaign to our database?

Bli en antibiotikasmart vatten- och avloppsverksamhet (Become an antibiotic-smart water and wastewater business)

Objective(s)
1. Prevent the spread of antibiotic residues and resistant microbes into the environment.
2. Promote engagement, systematic improvement, measurement, prevention, and knowledge building in the sector
Target audience
Public utility organisations
water distribution networks
drinking water plants
wastewater treatment facilities
Operational staff
environmental engineer
operators
Campaign Scope
National
Partners or Allies
Vinnova
RISE – Research Institutes of Sweden
Municipalities and Regions
Communication Channels Used
websites/blogs
Posters
Press releases
Community events
Presentations
Campaign Material(s)
Guides
Support documents
PowerPoints
Key messages
The water and wastewater sector (WAS) has a key role in the work towards an antibiotic-smart Sweden. By working with the AntibioticSmart Sweden criteria, you contribute to counteracting the spread of antibiotic substances and antibiotic-resistant microorganisms in society and the environment. (source: https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/antibiotikasmart-sverige/bli-antibiotikasmart/vatten-och-avlopp/vatten-och-avlopp-kriterier/)
Campaign Focus
Environment
Campaign Setting
Water and sewerage
Use of Scientific Evidence
Implicit Evidence-Based Messaging
Educational model applied
Participatory
Constructivist
Transmissive
Content Complexity Level
Intermediate
Content accessibility
Yes
Content accessibility
Audio description
Involvement of Vulnerable Groups
No
Cultural Sensitivity and Contextualization
No
Continuity strategy
Campaign with regular updates
Campaign Start Year
2019
Campaign End Year
2024
Replicability
Yes
Content usage license
Free
Campaign Status
Active
Quantitative impact indicators
Number of pilot and diploma-awarded organisations
Qualitative impact indicators
Participations
Measured results
1. Diploma awards: Norrvatten (Nov 2024) and Gästrike vatten (Jan 2025) confirmed implementation success .
2. Descriptions of participation in municipal workgroups (although not clear).
Estimated budget
2 200 000 €
Identified gaps
No scientific evidence or references, unclear if evidence-based
Credibility assumed due to source, no references
Accessible formats for hearing impaired users not provided
Key messages not clearly indicated
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) section not included
Interactive features not included
Audience-specific content not evident
Reporting on results or impact not found
Outreach activities not documented
Identified gaps
Potentially:
1. Measuring antibiotic levels in incoming wastewater.
2. Reducing bypass of biological treatment stages.
3. Safe sludge handling to prevent environmental antibiotic spread
Lessons learned
"Listen" button available improves accessibility for different audience
Lessons learned
1. Some defined quantitative indicators: Number of pilot and diploma-awarded organisations (e.g., Norrvatten, Gästrike vatten).
2. Sector engagement works: Active participation in municipal groups builds inter-sector understanding.
3. Pilot programs pay off: Early roll-out with major utilities enables proof-of-concept and recognition.
4. Diplomas motivate: Structured recognition encourages uptake and visibility within the sector.
Identified biases
1. Possible Selection Bias: Pilot participants may be larger or more environmental-aware utilities.
2. Reporting Bias: Reliance on self-reported data and qualitative submissions may vary in consistency.
3. Capacity Bias: Smaller plants may face challenges meeting measurement and planning criteria.
Identified Weaknesses
Lack of scientific evidence
Unclear or confusing messaging
Poor visual design
Limited accessibility
Limited feedback loop
Identified Weaknesses
1. Lack of qualitative and quantitative indicators e.g. Measurement frequency of antibiotic substances and indicator bacteria in effluent water; Volumes of unprocessed wastewater overflow and treatment metrics; Number of upstream-sector engagements documented.
2. Limited measurement adoption: Advanced metrics (e.g., incoming water antibiotic levels) are not mandatory and may be unevenly applied.
3. Resource disparities: Smaller or under-resourced facilities may struggle with required measurement and planning.
4. No gamification mechanisms: Diploma recognition may not sustain motivation without ongoing reinforcement.
Identified Strengths
Endorsements by Trusted Institutions
Identified Strengths
1. Collaborative design: Criteria developed in dialogue with actual sector professionals
2. Recognition structure: Diplomas awarded publicly (e.g., Norrvatten, Gästrike vatten) for credible progress
3. Supportive materials: Templates and letter guides facilitate sector engagement